A
AnyForce Lab
Sustained attention · Impulse control

CPT (Continuous Performance Test)

The CPT (Continuous Performance Test) is a classic paradigm for assessing sustained attention and response inhibition, widely used in ADHD research. This module uses the Not-X variant: respond to most letters and withhold response when X appears.

DifficultyExpert = strict academic parameters
Age band (for scoring reference)Not signed in (scores won't count toward profile)

Intermediate: 500ms letters, 5 min by default. Faster but manageable.

Letters appear one at a time. For any letter that is NOT X, press space (or tap the screen) immediately. When X appears, do nothing. Stay focused until the end.

Duration

History

No training records yet

Reference: Rosvold et al. (1956) / Conners CPT.

Scientific basis

CPT · scientific basis

Sustained attention & impulse control

The Continuous Performance Test, first described by Rosvold et al. (1956) to detect brain damage, was standardized by Conners (CPT-II / CPT-3). This module uses the Not-X variant: respond to all letters except X; withhold on X.

Expert-mode parameters

These are the standard parameters from the canonical paradigm (used by the "Expert" difficulty).

ParameterStandard valueSource
Stimulus duration (Expert)250 msConners CPT-II/III
ITI1 s / 2 s / 4 s blocked (here: 1000-2000 ms jittered)Conners CPT-II/III
Target (non-X) : X ratio90:10Conners CPT-II/III
Standard length~14 min / 360 trials (here: 3/6/10 min options)Conners CPT-II/III

Healthy-population norms (by age)

Conners CPT-II/III commercial norms are proprietary. Values here derive from peer-reviewed mean/SD (Lin 2003, Conners 2003) by age band: 'Hit rate excellent' = mean + 1 SD (capped at 99%); 'Omission rate' ≈ 1 − hit rate. RT variability (RTSD) is a robust ADHD marker. Assessment mode matches your actual age.

Limitations Primary reference is the proprietary Conners CPT (CPT-II 1995, CPT-3 2014). Peer-reviewed substitutes include Lin 2003 (Taiwanese children n>400, supports 10-17 y) and Conners 2003 epidemiological sample. Adult bands 18-44 y are largely interpolated/extrapolated (flagged est in norms.ts); 45+ y have some ADHD/aging support but norms remain sparse. Hit-rate ceiling makes older bands saturate at 99% — focus interpretation on RTSD and omission rate. For older-adult assessment cross-reference with TMT or SART (also sustained-attention / vigilance paradigms in this app).
Age bandHit rate ExcellentOmission rate meanRTSD mean (ms)Evidence
Age 8-9≥ 99%~6%~120weak (extrap.)
Age 10-11≥ 99%~4%~100medium
Age 12-13≥ 99%~3%~85medium
Age 14-15≥ 99%~2%~75medium
Age 16-17≥ 99%~2%~70medium
Age 18-24≥ 99%~2%~65strong
Age 25-34≥ 99%~2%~65strong
Age 35-44≥ 99%~2%~68weak (interp.)
Age 45-54≥ 99%~3%~72weak (interp.)
Age 55-64≥ 99%~3%~80weak (interp.)
Age 65+≥ 99%~4%~95weak (extrap.)

Standard output metrics

  • ·HitsCorrect key-presses on non-X targets
  • ·OmissionsMissed non-X — inattention index
  • ·CommissionsPressed on X — impulse/inhibition failure
  • ·Hit RTMean RT on correct presses
  • ·HRT SD (RT variability)Response-time consistency — robust ADHD marker
  • ·d'Signal-detection sensitivity (optional)

Citations

  1. Rosvold, H. E., Mirsky, A. F., Sarason, I., Bransome, E. D. Jr., & Beck, L. H. (1956). A continuous performance test of brain damage. J Consult Psychol, 20(5), 343-350. DOI
  2. Conners, C. K., Epstein, J. N., Angold, A., & Klaric, J. (2003). Continuous performance test performance in a normative epidemiological sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 31(5), 555-562. PubMed
  3. Riccio, C. A., Reynolds, C. R., Lowe, P., & Moore, J. J. (2002). The continuous performance test: A window on the neural substrates for attention? Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 17(3), 235-272. DOI
  4. Egeland, J., & Kovalik-Gran, I. (2010). Relations between the Conners' CPT performance measures and ADHD behaviors. J Atten Disord, 13(4). DOI

All reference ranges come from published peer-reviewed literature. For personal training reference only — not a medical diagnosis. Full methodology: docs/PARADIGMS.md.

This tool is for educational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or a clinical diagnosis.

AnyForce Lab — 脑健康评测与陪伴