A
AnyForce Lab
Visual search · Sustained attention

Schulte Grid

The Schulte Grid is a classic attention trainer. By searching for numbers in ascending order across a shuffled grid, you build visual search ability, peripheral vision and sustained focus.

5×5 (1-25): the canonical size from Schulte (1968).

Age band (for scoring reference)Not signed in (scores won't count toward profile)
Grid size: 5×5Elapsed: 0.00 s

When you hit Start, click the numbers from 1 up in order. Wrong taps aren't counted as errors but extend your time.

History

No training records yet

Reference: Schulte, W. (1968) original paradigm.

Scientific basis

Schulte Grid · scientific basis

Visual search & sustained attention

Defined by Walter Schulte in 1968 (Psychodiagnostische Aufgabentafeln) and adapted clinically by Gorbov in the Soviet tradition. A canonical tool for training focal attention; also widely used in speed-reading curricula.

Expert-mode parameters

These are the standard parameters from the canonical paradigm (used by the "Expert" difficulty).

ParameterStandard valueSource
Grid size3×3 to 7×7 selectable; standard 5×5 (1-25)Schulte 1968 / site extension
Typical protocol5 tables run consecutivelyGorbov 1964
Primary metricCompletion time T (s)Schulte 1968
Secondary (EW)Mean time across 5 tablesGorbov 1964

Healthy-population norms (by age)

Thresholds apply to 5×5; other grids scale linearly with cell count (4×4 ≈ × 16/25, 6×6 ≈ × 36/25). Visual scanning speed peaks at ages 16-25 — thresholds are tightest there and relax slowly with age. Assessment mode selects the band matching your actual profile age.

Limitations Schulte's literature base is thin — Schulte 1968 provided no norms; Gorbov 1964 comes from Soviet speed-reading / military training rather than peer-reviewed psychometrics; there is virtually no peer-reviewed Western adult Schulte standardization (the West uses TMT instead). Our thresholds draw on: (a) Korneev 2021 Russian schoolchildren cohort (peer-reviewed, n=860) directly supporting the 8-17 bands; (b) Gorbov-era trained-adult target values supporting 18-34; (c) ages 35+ are extrapolated from the general ~2-3s-per-decade visual-search decline, without direct Schulte data. For a stricter visual-search / processing-speed assessment we recommend the TMT module on this site — Tombaugh 2004 provides US n=911 age-and-education-stratified peer-reviewed norms (ages 18-89). Please cross-reference Schulte results against TMT-A.
Age bandExcellentAverageSlowEvidence
Ages 8-9≤ 35 s~46 s≥ 75 smedium
Ages 10-11≤ 30 s~37 s≥ 65 smedium
Ages 12-13≤ 26 s~31 s≥ 58 smedium
Ages 14-15≤ 23 s~26 s≥ 52 smedium
Ages 16-17≤ 22 s~22 s≥ 48 smedium
Ages 18-24≤ 22 s~22 s≥ 48 smedium-weak
Ages 25-34≤ 25 s~25 s≥ 55 smedium-weak
Ages 35-44≤ 27 s~30 s≥ 58 sweak (extrap.)
Ages 45-54≤ 30 s~35 s≥ 63 sweak (extrap.)
Ages 55-64≤ 35 s~42 s≥ 70 sweak (extrap.)
Ages 65+≤ 40 s~48 s≥ 78 sweak (extrap.)

Standard output metrics

  • ·T (completion time)Primary metric — lower is better
  • ·EWMean time across 5 consecutive tables
  • ·PST4 ÷ EW — fatigue index
  • ·WAT1 ÷ EW — warm-up index
  • ·MisclicksOperational accuracy

Citations

  1. Schulte, W. (1968). Psychodiagnostische Aufgabentafeln. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Google Books
  2. Gorbov, F. D. (1964). Experimental-psychological study of attention disturbances. Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. PubMed
  3. Korneev, A. A., et al. (2021). Developmental norms for neuropsychological tests. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 14(4), 18-37. PDF

All reference ranges come from published peer-reviewed literature. For personal training reference only — not a medical diagnosis. Full methodology: docs/PARADIGMS.md.

This tool is for educational and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute medical advice or a clinical diagnosis.

AnyForce Lab — 脑健康评测与陪伴